On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 11:21:15AM -0500, David Hill wrote:
> Here is an updated diff without explicitly setting 0/NULL.
>
> --- kern/uipc_proto.c 5 Feb 2017 07:57:08 - 1.11
> +++ kern/uipc_proto.c 21 Feb 2017 00:42:46 -
> +{
> + .pr_type = SOCK_STREAM,
> + .pr_domain = &unixdoma
Here is an updated diff without explicitly setting 0/NULL.
Index: kern/uipc_proto.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/kern/uipc_proto.c,v
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -p -r1.11 uipc_proto.c
--- kern/uipc_proto.c 5 Feb 2017 07:57:08 -00
On 20/02/17(Mon) 22:30, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> David Hill schreef op 2017-02-19 03:22:
> > Hello -
> >
> > This moves the 'struct protosw' declarations to use C99 initializers.
> > Requested by mpi@
>
> With C99 initializers it is no longer necessary to explicitly
> initialize zero-initialized me
David Hill schreef op 2017-02-19 03:22:
Hello -
This moves the 'struct protosw' declarations to use C99 initializers.
Requested by mpi@
With C99 initializers it is no longer necessary to explicitly
initialize zero-initialized members (such as null-pointers).
That could reduce the diff consider
David Hill writes:
> Hello -
>
> This moves the 'struct protosw' declarations to use C99 initializers.
> Requested by mpi@
ok jca@
Just one nit,
[...]
> Index: net/rtsock.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/net/rtsock.c,v
> retrievi
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 09:22:44PM -0500, David Hill wrote:
> Hello -
>
> This moves the 'struct protosw' declarations to use C99 initializers.
> Requested by mpi@
>
Apologies for not explaining the reason for the diff.
It would allow us to easily grep for a member, such as pr_ctloutput,
and kno
Hello -
This moves the 'struct protosw' declarations to use C99 initializers.
Requested by mpi@
Index: kern/uipc_proto.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/kern/uipc_proto.c,v
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -p -r1.11 uipc_proto.c
--- kern/
