Ok
On 27/12/2013 5:28 am, "Mark Kettenis" wrote:
> Our bus_dmamap(9) man page says:
>
> On platforms which implement reordered stores, bus_dmamap_sync()
> will always cause the store buffer to be flushed.
>
> In 2003 NetBSD actually changed that to:
>
> On platforms which implement a weak m
> Our bus_dmamap(9) man page says:
>
> On platforms which implement reordered stores, bus_dmamap_sync()
> will always cause the store buffer to be flushed.
>
> In 2003 NetBSD actually changed that to:
>
> On platforms which implement a weak memory access ordering model,
> bus_dmamap_sync
Our bus_dmamap(9) man page says:
On platforms which implement reordered stores, bus_dmamap_sync()
will always cause the store buffer to be flushed.
In 2003 NetBSD actually changed that to:
On platforms which implement a weak memory access ordering model,
bus_dmamap_sync() will always cau