> On 2 Mar 2016, at 8:04 PM, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>
> On 02/03/16(Wed) 10:33, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
>> On 2 March 2016 at 05:50, David Gwynne wrote:
>>> the max_link hdr is basically how much space to reserve before an
>>> ip packet for link headers, eg, ethernet.
>>>
>>> 16 bytes was a good
On 02/03/16(Wed) 10:33, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> On 2 March 2016 at 05:50, David Gwynne wrote:
> > the max_link hdr is basically how much space to reserve before an
> > ip packet for link headers, eg, ethernet.
> >
> > 16 bytes was a good choice when everything was just ip inside
> > ethernet, but
> On 2 Mar 2016, at 7:33 PM, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
>
> On 2 March 2016 at 05:50, David Gwynne wrote:
>> the max_link hdr is basically how much space to reserve before an
>> ip packet for link headers, eg, ethernet.
>>
>> 16 bytes was a good choice when everything was just ip inside
>> ethernet
On 2 March 2016 at 05:50, David Gwynne wrote:
> the max_link hdr is basically how much space to reserve before an
> ip packet for link headers, eg, ethernet.
>
> 16 bytes was a good choice when everything was just ip inside
> ethernet, but now we deal with a bunch of encapsulations which blow
> th
the max_link hdr is basically how much space to reserve before an
ip packet for link headers, eg, ethernet.
16 bytes was a good choice when everything was just ip inside
ethernet, but now we deal with a bunch of encapsulations which blow
that out of the water. 16 bytes isnt even enough if we have
