On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 05:45:58PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 05:36:49PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 05:05:59PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > > The hash table for communities is not great. Instead of implementing
> > > dynamic hash resize use
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 05:36:49PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 05:05:59PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > The hash table for communities is not great. Instead of implementing
> > dynamic hash resize use a RB tree. Also drop the hash calculation and
> > just use memcmp() for
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 05:05:59PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> The hash table for communities is not great. Instead of implementing
> dynamic hash resize use a RB tree. Also drop the hash calculation and
> just use memcmp() for now. My non scientific test seems to indicate that
> the overhead of
The hash table for communities is not great. Instead of implementing
dynamic hash resize use a RB tree. Also drop the hash calculation and
just use memcmp() for now. My non scientific test seems to indicate that
the overhead of SipHash is about the same as the memcmp().
--
:wq Claudio
Index: bgp
