On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 02:46:55PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> I forgot to mention that. So during reconfigure rde_up_flush_upcall()
> walks over the full adj_rib_out tree. This includes pending withdraws and
> we need to properly handle them. I decided it is best to revert this back
> to the way
On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 01:25:42PM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 01:07:09PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 01:03:04PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > > This diff changes prefix_adjout_withdraw() to take a prefix pointer
> > > as argument. So instead o
On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 01:07:09PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 01:03:04PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > This diff changes prefix_adjout_withdraw() to take a prefix pointer
> > as argument. So instead of doing the lookup in the withdraw function the
> > caller may need to
On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 01:03:04PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> This diff changes prefix_adjout_withdraw() to take a prefix pointer
> as argument. So instead of doing the lookup in the withdraw function the
> caller may need to do it.
>
> With this one call to up_generate_updates() can be replace
This diff changes prefix_adjout_withdraw() to take a prefix pointer
as argument. So instead of doing the lookup in the withdraw function the
caller may need to do it.
With this one call to up_generate_updates() can be replaced with a direct
call to prefix_adjout_withdraw(). rde_up_flush_upcall() t