Re: bgpd adjust ASPA validation for non-transparent RS

2023-01-27 Thread Theo Buehler
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 12:20:29PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote: > This diff is a result of a longer discussion with Sriram from NIST about > ASPA validation behaviour on route-servers and especially non-transparent RS. > > Handling transparent route-servers (which is the default) requires no > spec

bgpd adjust ASPA validation for non-transparent RS

2023-01-25 Thread Claudio Jeker
This diff is a result of a longer discussion with Sriram from NIST about ASPA validation behaviour on route-servers and especially non-transparent RS. Handling transparent route-servers (which is the default) requires no special handling in the validation logic. The route-server AS will never show