On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 10:37:50PM +0200, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> Claudio Jeker(cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com) on 2018.08.09 21:59:16 +0200:
> > On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 03:10:11PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > > Per rfc6472 AS_SET should no longer be used but some AS still do.
> > > Until now source
Claudio Jeker(cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com) on 2018.08.09 21:59:16 +0200:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 03:10:11PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > Per rfc6472 AS_SET should no longer be used but some AS still do.
> > Until now source-as would take the rightmost AS number of an AS_PATH no
> > matter if it w
On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 03:10:11PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> Per rfc6472 AS_SET should no longer be used but some AS still do.
> Until now source-as would take the rightmost AS number of an AS_PATH no
> matter if it was an AS_SEQUENCE or an AS_SET. Thit is not correct. Also
> because AS_SET are
On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 03:10:11PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> Per rfc6472 AS_SET should no longer be used but some AS still do.
> Until now source-as would take the rightmost AS number of an AS_PATH
> no matter if it was an AS_SEQUENCE or an AS_SET. Thit is not correct.
Indeed, good find!
> Al
Claudio Jeker(cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com) on 2018.08.09 15:10:11 +0200:
> Per rfc6472 AS_SET should no longer be used but some AS still do.
> Until now source-as would take the rightmost AS number of an AS_PATH no
> matter if it was an AS_SEQUENCE or an AS_SET. Thit is not correct. Also
> because AS_
Per rfc6472 AS_SET should no longer be used but some AS still do.
Until now source-as would take the rightmost AS number of an AS_PATH no
matter if it was an AS_SEQUENCE or an AS_SET. Thit is not correct. Also
because AS_SET are used in aggregation source-as should match against the
aggregator AS (
