> now with reload working; check RTP_NONE < fib-priority <= RTP_MAX
For some reason, I can't reply to Loic's followup email...
I disagree with his comment; while it's usually silly to have a BGP route
preferred over a connected route, I can think of at least one case
(tunnels) where it might mak
Hi Florian,
good job.
I think it's better to set minimum to RTP_CONNECTED+1 instead of
RTP_NONE+1
--
Best regards,
Loïc BLOT,
UNIX systems, security and network engineer
http://www.unix-experience.fr
Le samedi 09 novembre 2013 à 21:04 +, Florian Obser a écrit :
> now with reload working;
now with reload working; check RTP_NONE < fib-priority <= RTP_MAX
test reports / comments / OKs?
diff --git bgpd.c bgpd.c
index 9c48bb3..8ad95fe 100644
--- bgpd.c
+++ bgpd.c
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ int check_child(pid_t, const char *);
intsend_filterset(struct imsgbuf *, struct f
First stab, only lightly tested, reload is *not* working. I need to
think a bit more how to handle reloads exactly.
Note that if you try to shoot yourself in the foot by specifing
another already used priority (e.g. 32), it will not only take of your
foot but take the thigh right with it... (at le
