I am really against the idea of the parser inspecting a static buffer
from the lex.
Also we have a ton of these parsers, and discourage them from deviating.
This tiny little "please use the right keyword" change feels so minor; we
do not have a generic error-correction-proposing parser, 99% of pl
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 07:33:40AM +0200, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 02:40:57PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> > handling the "no" option with a token, and "yes" via a string made my
> > eye twitch.
> >
> > ok? or is the helpful yyerror a nice feature?
> >
>
>
Hello,
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 02:40:57PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> handling the "no" option with a token, and "yes" via a string made my
> eye twitch.
>
> ok? or is the helpful yyerror a nice feature?
>
I actually think it's a nice feature. below is output
for current pfctl we have
handling the "no" option with a token, and "yes" via a string made my
eye twitch.
ok? or is the helpful yyerror a nice feature?
Index: parse.y
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/pfctl/parse.y,v
retrieving revision 1.709
diff -u -p -r1.709 p
