> > nobody should really be using srandom, but we provide it and it's a
> > tempting target, so they do. let's give them arandom instead. they'll
> > never know the difference, except it may actually work. :)
>
> I don't like this. If I was generating a particularly high-value key
> (e.g. a l
On Fri, 1 Oct 2010, Ted Unangst wrote:
> nobody should really be using srandom, but we provide it and it's a
> tempting target, so they do. let's give them arandom instead. they'll
> never know the difference, except it may actually work. :)
I don't like this. If I was generating a particula
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 11:36:25AM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> nobody should really be using srandom, but we provide it and it's a
> tempting target, so they do. let's give them arandom instead. they'll
> never know the difference, except it may actually work. :)
>
> i included a conversion f
nobody should really be using srandom, but we provide it and it's a
tempting target, so they do. let's give them arandom instead. they'll
never know the difference, except it may actually work. :)
i included a conversion for urandom on the same principle.
Index: rnd.c
===
