Re: bc and editline

2011-05-31 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 05:57:18PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 07:02:55AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > adding editline caused a regrssion in the handling of ^C. > > > > Originally (and I mean the days of AT&T) bc used ^C as an abort line. > > With edit

Re: bc and editline

2011-05-26 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 07:02:55AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > Hi, > > adding editline caused a regrssion in the handling of ^C. > > Originally (and I mean the days of AT&T) bc used ^C as an abort line. > With editline, while appearing to work, the characters typed so far > remain in the input

bc and editline

2011-05-25 Thread Otto Moerbeek
Hi, adding editline caused a regrssion in the handling of ^C. Originally (and I mean the days of AT&T) bc used ^C as an abort line. With editline, while appearing to work, the characters typed so far remain in the input buffer. Try this: 1+^C2 Editline has no signal safe facility to accomodate t