On Wed, 31 Jan 2018, Alexei Malinin wrote:
> Hello.
>
> If the base system supported multi-booting in MBR would the community be
> interested in it?
Doesn't it already? "machine boot sd0X"
Very interesting. Thanks for the information.
--
Alexei Malinin
On 02/01/18 04:39, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2018 17:05:57 -0500
> Bryan Steele wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 10:41:48PM +0100, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
>>> Alexei Malinin:
>>>
If the base system support
On Wed, 31 Jan 2018 17:05:57 -0500
Bryan Steele wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 10:41:48PM +0100, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
>> Alexei Malinin:
>>
>> > If the base system supported multi-booting in MBR would the community be
>> > interested in it?
>>
>> It should be easy to adapt FreeBSD's boo
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 10:41:48PM +0100, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Alexei Malinin:
>
> > If the base system supported multi-booting in MBR would the community be
> > interested in it?
>
> It should be easy to adapt FreeBSD's boot0. I don't remember any
> demand for it, and now MBR is on its
Alexei Malinin:
> If the base system supported multi-booting in MBR would the community be
> interested in it?
It should be easy to adapt FreeBSD's boot0. I don't remember any
demand for it, and now MBR is on its way out...
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/stand/i386/boot0/boot0.S
boot0 +
Hello.
If the base system supported multi-booting in MBR would the community be
interested in it?
--
Alexei Malinin