On 2021-09-02 15:00 +02, Florian Obser wrote:
> On 2021-09-01 04:05 -06, "Theo de Raadt" wrote:
>> Stuart Henderson wrote:
>>
>>> On 2021/09/01 11:25, Florian Obser wrote:
>>> > So traceroute sends one probe, waits upto 5^W3 seconds for an answer to
>>> > arrive, sends the next probe and so on.
On 2021-09-01 04:05 -06, "Theo de Raadt" wrote:
> Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
>> On 2021/09/01 11:25, Florian Obser wrote:
>> > So traceroute sends one probe, waits upto 5^W3 seconds for an answer to
>> > arrive, sends the next probe and so on.
>> >
>> > This makes it a bit faster (10x on a path w
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2021/09/01 11:25, Florian Obser wrote:
> > So traceroute sends one probe, waits upto 5^W3 seconds for an answer to
> > arrive, sends the next probe and so on.
> >
> > This makes it a bit faster (10x on a path with two intermediate systems
> > not answering) by sendin
On 2021/09/01 11:25, Florian Obser wrote:
> So traceroute sends one probe, waits upto 5^W3 seconds for an answer to
> arrive, sends the next probe and so on.
>
> This makes it a bit faster (10x on a path with two intermediate systems
> not answering) by sending probes, waiting for the answer and d
So traceroute sends one probe, waits upto 5^W3 seconds for an answer to
arrive, sends the next probe and so on.
This makes it a bit faster (10x on a path with two intermediate systems
not answering) by sending probes, waiting for the answer and doing
reverse DNS lookups async.
Please test.
diff