Mark Kettenis:
> > This drops support for building the armv7 kernel with gcc and reduces
> > the difference to arm64.
>
> If we're keeping the gcc bits on other architectures, it makes sense
> to keep it here as well. Helps with diffability and someone might
> want to run the same tools for armv
Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2019 17:32:04 +0200
> > From: Christian Weisgerber
> >
> > This drops support for building the armv7 kernel with gcc and reduces
> > the difference to arm64.
> >
> > I can't test this.
> >
> > OK? Or it can be rolled into somebody else's larger "remo
> Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2019 17:32:04 +0200
> From: Christian Weisgerber
>
> This drops support for building the armv7 kernel with gcc and reduces
> the difference to arm64.
>
> I can't test this.
>
> OK? Or it can be rolled into somebody else's larger "remove gcc
> from armv7" diff.
If we're keep
> OK? Or it can be rolled into somebody else's larger "remove gcc
> from armv7" diff.
This is fine with me as-is.
This drops support for building the armv7 kernel with gcc and reduces
the difference to arm64.
I can't test this.
OK? Or it can be rolled into somebody else's larger "remove gcc
from armv7" diff.
Index: arch/armv7/conf/Makefile.armv7
=
