On Sat, 17 Sep 2016, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 09:38:46 -0700
> > From: Philip Guenther
...
> > Instead of a conditional in the Makefile, can't this all go under
> > arch/arm?
>
> It could. Not sure where exectly I should put it though. In a new
> dlfcn subdirectory under
> Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 09:38:46 -0700
> From: Philip Guenther
>
> On Sat, 17 Sep 2016, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Note that libunwind uses __gnu_Unwind_Find_exidx on Linux, so we could
> > follow Linux here and drop the dl_unwind_find_exidx alias. But my
> > personal preference is to follow the
On Sat, 17 Sep 2016, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Note that libunwind uses __gnu_Unwind_Find_exidx on Linux, so we could
> follow Linux here and drop the dl_unwind_find_exidx alias. But my
> personal preference is to follow the other BSDs here.
The downside of the name used by the other BSDs is that it
For some reason ARM wants to be different. The EABI exception
handling ABI (EHABI for short) uses an ARM.exidx section and the
PT_ARM_EXIDX entry to find the exeption handling information, and libc
(or ld.so) needs to provide a helper function to support this. In the
GCC world, the function is na