12/21/22 11:58, Jason McIntyre пишет:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 07:40:01AM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 08:24:29PM +, Jason McIntyre wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 06:24:45PM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
Feedback? OK?
>>>
>>> ok, in general i'm fine w
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 07:40:01AM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 08:24:29PM +, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 06:24:45PM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > >
> > > Feedback? OK?
> > >
> >
> > ok, in general i'm fine with this. i do have some concerns t
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 08:24:29PM +, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 06:24:45PM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> >
> > Feedback? OK?
> >
>
> ok, in general i'm fine with this. i do have some concerns though:
New diff with all points addressed, see inline for explanations.
Jus
12/21/22 00:53, Theo de Raadt пишет:
> This went from solving one thing, which was largely agreed.
>
> Now it is trying to introduce other changes as well. Almost always that
> process stinks, unless it goes over the top at saying it is trying to solve
> other problems when the diff is re-introdu
Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 01:53:18PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > This went from solving one thing, which was largely agreed.
> >
> > Now it is trying to introduce other changes as well. Almost always that
> > process stinks, unless it goes over the top at saying it is
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 01:53:18PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> This went from solving one thing, which was largely agreed.
>
> Now it is trying to introduce other changes as well. Almost always that
> process stinks, unless it goes over the top at saying it is trying to solve
> other problems w
12/21/22 00:24, Jason McIntyre пишет:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 06:24:45PM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> expr(1) is a good example. i think it doesn;t matter that expr can take
> one arg or many.
But it does, which is why the expr(1) could be considered a bug fix:
$ expr '1 + 2'
1
This went from solving one thing, which was largely agreed.
Now it is trying to introduce other changes as well. Almost always that
process stinks, unless it goes over the top at saying it is trying to solve
other problems when the diff is re-introduced. It is sneaky, and usually
seems to be a w
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 06:24:45PM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
>
> Feedback? OK?
>
ok, in general i'm fine with this. i do have some concerns though:
>
> Index: share/man/man4/ddb.4
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man4/ddb.4,
12/20/22 20:16, Ingo Schwarze пишет:
> Hi Klemens,
>
> Jason McIntyre wrote on Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 10:35:19AM +:
>> On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 09:36:39AM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
>
>>> Both styles are used, but I argue that the former fails to distinguish
>>> between
>>> $ program 'args
Todd C. Miller wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Dec 2022 10:35:19 +, Jason McIntyre wrote:
>
> > also some things will use argument vs arg. for example ssh(1). do you
> > propose to change those?
>
> I have no strong opinion on "arg" vs. "argument". It probably makes
> sense to standardize on whichever
On Tue, 20 Dec 2022 10:35:19 +, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> also some things will use argument vs arg. for example ssh(1). do you
> propose to change those?
I have no strong opinion on "arg" vs. "argument". It probably makes
sense to standardize on whichever is most prevalent in our
documentatio
Hi Klemens,
Jason McIntyre wrote on Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 10:35:19AM +:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 09:36:39AM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
>> Both styles are used, but I argue that the former fails to distinguish
>> between
>> $ program 'args in one shell word'
>> and
>> $ program one
12/20/22 19:26, Todd C. Miller пишет:
> On Tue, 20 Dec 2022 09:36:39 +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
>
>> Both styles are used, but I argue that the former fails to distinguish
>> between
>> $ program 'args in one shell word'
>> and
>> $ program one arg per shell word
>>
>> It's a minor thin
On Tue, 20 Dec 2022 09:36:39 +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> Both styles are used, but I argue that the former fails to distinguish
> between
> $ program 'args in one shell word'
> and
> $ program one arg per shell word
>
> It's a minor thing, imho, but perhaps we can decide for one and
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 09:36:39AM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> Both styles are used, but I argue that the former fails to distinguish
> between
> $ program 'args in one shell word'
> and
> $ program one arg per shell word
>
> It's a minor thing, imho, but perhaps we can decide for on
Both styles are used, but I argue that the former fails to distinguish
between
$ program 'args in one shell word'
and
$ program one arg per shell word
It's a minor thing, imho, but perhaps we can decide for one and stick to
it throughout the tree?
Triple dots also make it immediat
17 matches
Mail list logo
