> Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 20:03:15 +0200
> From: Denis Fondras
>
> Le Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 10:45:39PM +0200, Mark Kettenis a écrit :
> > Now that the kernel supports the extended BOOTARG_CONSDEV struct and
> > snaps with that change are out there, here is the diff that changes
> > the amd64 bootlo
Le Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 10:45:39PM +0200, Mark Kettenis a écrit :
> Now that the kernel supports the extended BOOTARG_CONSDEV struct and
> snaps with that change are out there, here is the diff that changes
> the amd64 bootloaders to switch to the extended struct and provide the
> parameters necess
On 6.7.2022. 22:45, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Now that the kernel supports the extended BOOTARG_CONSDEV struct and
> snaps with that change are out there, here is the diff that changes
> the amd64 bootloaders to switch to the extended struct and provide the
> parameters necessary for using the non-sta
Now that the kernel supports the extended BOOTARG_CONSDEV struct and
snaps with that change are out there, here is the diff that changes
the amd64 bootloaders to switch to the extended struct and provide the
parameters necessary for using the non-standard UART on the AMD Ryzen
Embedded V1000 SoCs.
On 30.6.2022. 17:03, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2022/06/30 16:55, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
>> On 30.6.2022. 16:48, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
>>> On 30.6.2022. 15:14, Anton Lindqvist wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 01:07:46PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Ah right. Please commit!
Here's t
On 2022/06/30 16:55, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> On 30.6.2022. 16:48, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> > On 30.6.2022. 15:14, Anton Lindqvist wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 01:07:46PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> >>> Ah right. Please commit!
> >> Here's the complete diff, ok?
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >
On Thu, Jun 30 2022, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> On 30.6.2022. 16:48, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
>> On 30.6.2022. 15:14, Anton Lindqvist wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 01:07:46PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Ah right. Please commit!
>>> Here's the complete diff, ok?
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> with th
On 30.6.2022. 16:48, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> On 30.6.2022. 15:14, Anton Lindqvist wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 01:07:46PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>>> Ah right. Please commit!
>> Here's the complete diff, ok?
>
>
> Hi,
>
> with this diff :
>
> dell r620 - serial console
> com1 at acpi
On 30.6.2022. 15:14, Anton Lindqvist wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 01:07:46PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> Ah right. Please commit!
> Here's the complete diff, ok?
Hi,
with this diff :
dell r620 - serial console
com1 at acpi0 COMA addr 0x2f8/0x8 irq 3: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo
com1: console
Forget about efi32 and efi64 (I just got permission from mlarkin to remove
those).
The efiboot and stand/libsa bits are ok kettenis@
> Op 30-06-2022 15:14 schreef Anton Lindqvist :
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 01:07:46PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Ah right. Please commit!
>
> Here's th
On 30.6.2022. 10:26, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Hi Hrvoje,
>
> I assume it was faster before? What hardware are you seeing this on?
Hi,
yes, it was faster before.
dell r620 - serial console
com1 at acpi0 COMA addr 0x2f8/0x8 irq 3: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo
com1: console
com0 at acpi0 COMB addr 0x3f8/
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 01:07:46PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Ah right. Please commit!
Here's the complete diff, ok?
diff --git sys/arch/amd64/stand/efi32/exec_i386.c
sys/arch/amd64/stand/efi32/exec_i386.c
index 8349d97fefb..21f13cd273b 100644
--- sys/arch/amd64/stand/efi32/exec_i386.c
+++ s
Ah right. Please commit!
> Op 30-06-2022 11:55 schreef Anton Lindqvist :
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 08:52:33AM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> > On 27.6.2022. 23:44, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > The Ryzen Embedded V1000 processors have an arm64-style Synposys
> > > DesignWare UART instead if
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 08:52:33AM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> On 27.6.2022. 23:44, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > The Ryzen Embedded V1000 processors have an arm64-style Synposys
> > DesignWare UART instead if a PC-compatible NS16x50 UART. To make this
> > UART work as a serial console, we need to
Hi Hrvoje,
I assume it was faster before? What hardware are you seeing this on?
Thanks,
Mark
> Op 30-06-2022 08:52 schreef Hrvoje Popovski :
>
>
> On 27.6.2022. 23:44, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > The Ryzen Embedded V1000 processors have an arm64-style Synposys
> > DesignWare UART instead if a
On 27.6.2022. 23:44, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> The Ryzen Embedded V1000 processors have an arm64-style Synposys
> DesignWare UART instead if a PC-compatible NS16x50 UART. To make this
> UART work as a serial console, we need to pass some more information
> from the bootloader to the kernel. This dif
The Ryzen Embedded V1000 processors have an arm64-style Synposys
DesignWare UART instead if a PC-compatible NS16x50 UART. To make this
UART work as a serial console, we need to pass some more information
from the bootloader to the kernel. This diff adds the logic to handle
that information to the
17 matches
Mail list logo
