On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 22:30:31 MST, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > you forgot https_proxy and no_proxy...
> >
> > however, im against this change since it allows a user to redirect a progra
> m
> > they need privileges to use to an arbitrary proxy they specify, something
> > there is no good mitigation a
> you forgot https_proxy and no_proxy...
>
> however, im against this change since it allows a user to redirect a program
> they need privileges to use to an arbitrary proxy they specify, something
> there is no good mitigation against.
Indeed. That's right, isn't it Todd?
The whole idea here w
you forgot https_proxy and no_proxy...
however, im against this change since it allows a user to redirect a program
they need privileges to use to an arbitrary proxy they specify, something
there is no good mitigation against.
dlg
On 16/01/2012, at 12:15 AM, Peter Hessler wrote:
> When you are
I need this @ work.
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Peter Hessler wrote:
> When you are in a place that requires proxy configs to reach the
> internet, it would be very nice if you could then use pkg_add.
>
> So, add ftp_proxy and http_proxy to the default env_keep variable.
>
> OK?
>
> Index:
When you are in a place that requires proxy configs to reach the
internet, it would be very nice if you could then use pkg_add.
So, add ftp_proxy and http_proxy to the default env_keep variable.
OK?
Index: usr.bin/sudo/sudoers
===
R
