On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 10:55:07PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 21:25:25 +0200
> > From: Marcus Glocker
> >
> > I found a second thermal sensor INT3403 in my X1 which didn't attach
> > to acpitz(4) because its type returns AML_OBJTYPE_DEVICE instead of
> > AML_OBJTYPE_T
> Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 21:25:25 +0200
> From: Marcus Glocker
>
> I found a second thermal sensor INT3403 in my X1 which didn't attach
> to acpitz(4) because its type returns AML_OBJTYPE_DEVICE instead of
> AML_OBJTYPE_THERMZONE.
>
> When matching it explicitly it attaches to acpitz1 and seems
I found a second thermal sensor INT3403 in my X1 which didn't attach
to acpitz(4) because its type returns AML_OBJTYPE_DEVICE instead of
AML_OBJTYPE_THERMZONE.
When matching it explicitly it attaches to acpitz1 and seems to work
fine (I did some load tests to see it scaling up and down):
hw.se
