Re: Use m_defrag in intel wireless drivers

2015-05-27 Thread Mike Belopuhov
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 22:56 +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > Some of you may have seen the iwn(4) diff before, but I tweaked it a > bit to minimize the diff. Tested iwn(4) and wpi(4) myself. Further > tests and/or ok's are welcome. > OK mikeb

Re: Use m_defrag in intel wireless drivers

2015-05-27 Thread Mark Kettenis
> From: Alexey Suslikov > Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 06:51:58 + (UTC) > > Mark Kettenis xs4all.nl> writes: > > > Index: if_ipw.c > > /* too many fragments, linearize */ > > > Index: if_iwi.c > > /* too many fragments, linearize */ > > > Index: if_iwn.c > >

Re: Use m_defrag in intel wireless drivers

2015-05-26 Thread Alexey Suslikov
Mark Kettenis xs4all.nl> writes: > Index: if_ipw.c > /* too many fragments, linearize */ > Index: if_iwi.c > /* too many fragments, linearize */ > Index: if_iwn.c > /* Too many DMA segments, linearize mbuf. */ > Index: if_wpi.c > /* Too m

Use m_defrag in intel wireless drivers

2015-05-26 Thread Mark Kettenis
Some of you may have seen the iwn(4) diff before, but I tweaked it a bit to minimize the diff. Tested iwn(4) and wpi(4) myself. Further tests and/or ok's are welcome. Index: if_ipw.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/if_ipw.c,v re