Re: Undefined symbol in ld.so

2014-06-24 Thread William Orr
Whoops! Sorry for the confusion; disregard. On Jun 24, 2014, at 3:31 AM, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 01:30:55AM -0700, William Orr wrote: > >> ld.so in -current isn't building right now, due to an undefined reference to >> _dl_realloc caused by the recent addition of _dl_real

Re: Undefined symbol in ld.so

2014-06-24 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 01:30:55AM -0700, William Orr wrote: > ld.so in -current isn't building right now, due to an undefined reference to > _dl_realloc caused by the recent addition of _dl_reallocarray. The following > diff implements _dl_realloc, largely copied from the implementation in > lib/

Re: Undefined symbol in ld.so

2014-06-24 Thread Nigel Taylor
On 06/24/14 09:30, William Orr wrote: > ld.so in -current isn't building right now, due to an undefined reference to > _dl_realloc caused by the recent addition of _dl_reallocarray. The following > diff implements _dl_realloc, largely copied from the implementation in > lib/libc/stdlib/malloc.c. >

Undefined symbol in ld.so

2014-06-24 Thread William Orr
ld.so in -current isn't building right now, due to an undefined reference to _dl_realloc caused by the recent addition of _dl_reallocarray. The following diff implements _dl_realloc, largely copied from the implementation in lib/libc/stdlib/malloc.c. tested on amd64 Index: malloc.c ==