> 1. I don't see much reason to mention calloc() as an alternative to
> reallocarray() when it's the worse option.
calloc() still remains the portable option. Something should probably
still be mentioned here, otherwise people fall back to unchecked
malloc -- no matter what is stated further belo
1. I don't see much reason to mention calloc() as an alternative to
reallocarray() when it's the worse option.
2. Use size > 0 when testing overflow.
ok?
Index: lib/libc/stdlib/malloc.3
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libc/stdlib/malloc
