On 2014/11/24 09:59, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Thing is, in a few cases we have de-forked as well. For instance, in
> less(1). Hmm, kind of relevant recently..
Fortunately we don't have ours use lesspipe by default :-)
On 24 November 2014 at 16:42, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been trying to fix a bug in tcpdump but the rottenness
> of the current code base with it's horrendous APIs is just
> getting in the way. What if we trimmed it a bit, say killed
> all those pesky 'register' values, kill protocols
> >> I've been trying to fix a bug in tcpdump but the rottenness
> >> of the current code base with it's horrendous APIs is just
> >> getting in the way. What if we trimmed it a bit, say killed
> >> all those pesky 'register' values,
That would be cleanup, which then allows the code to be improve
On 24 November 2014 at 18:01, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> On 24 November 2014 at 17:20, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
>> On 24 November 2014 at 16:42, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've been trying to fix a bug in tcpdump but the rottenness
>>> of the current code base with it's horrendous APIs is j
On 24 November 2014 at 17:20, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> On 24 November 2014 at 16:42, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been trying to fix a bug in tcpdump but the rottenness
>> of the current code base with it's horrendous APIs is just
>> getting in the way. What if we trimmed it a bit, say
> On 2014/11/24 16:42, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've been trying to fix a bug in tcpdump but the rottenness
> > of the current code base with it's horrendous APIs is just
> > getting in the way. What if we trimmed it a bit, say killed
> > all those pesky 'register' values, kill proto
On 2014/11/24 16:42, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been trying to fix a bug in tcpdump but the rottenness
> of the current code base with it's horrendous APIs is just
> getting in the way. What if we trimmed it a bit, say killed
> all those pesky 'register' values, kill protocols that we
>
On 24 November 2014 at 16:42, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been trying to fix a bug in tcpdump but the rottenness
> of the current code base with it's horrendous APIs is just
> getting in the way. What if we trimmed it a bit, say killed
> all those pesky 'register' values, kill protocols
Hi,
I've been trying to fix a bug in tcpdump but the rottenness
of the current code base with it's horrendous APIs is just
getting in the way. What if we trimmed it a bit, say killed
all those pesky 'register' values, kill protocols that we
cannot really test (appletalk, fddi, etc.), kill dissect
