On 25/04/14(Fri) 15:59, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 25/04/14(Fri) 15:46, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > [...]
> > Regarding the tree, when Henning added ifa_add/del prior to its addition,
> > he also used it for link-layer addresses. But ifa_ifwithaddr() was not
> > dealing with link-layer addresses a
On 25/04/14(Fri) 15:46, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> [...]
> Regarding the tree, when Henning added ifa_add/del prior to its addition,
> he also used it for link-layer addresses. But ifa_ifwithaddr() was not
> dealing with link-layer addresses at that time! So when ifa_add/del
> got modified to add e
...actually we don't even need it for the per-ifp address list! This is
a result of my recent RTAX_IFP/sadl cleanup.
Historically the link-layer ifa has been the first element of the
per-ifp address list. This requirement is no longer necessary since
r1.154 of net/route.c, we now use the if_sad
