> > Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 11:31:48 +0200
> > From: Tristan Le Guern
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This patch for /usr/share/misc/getopt enforces the use of getprogname()
> > instead of __progname.
> >
> > Is this desirable? If so I also have a patch for style(9).
>
> getprogname(3) isn't really more po
> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 11:31:48 +0200
> From: Tristan Le Guern
>
> Hi,
>
> This patch for /usr/share/misc/getopt enforces the use of getprogname()
> instead of __progname.
>
> Is this desirable? If so I also have a patch for style(9).
getprogname(3) isn't really more portable than __progname
Hi,
This patch for /usr/share/misc/getopt enforces the use of getprogname()
instead of __progname.
Is this desirable? If so I also have a patch for style(9).
Index: getopt
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/share/misc/getopt,v
retrieving revisio