On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 12:28:41PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 18/03/14(Tue) 11:26, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> > On 18 March 2014 07:20, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 11:41:38AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > >> > What about using a more generic name which is not bound to
On 18/03/14(Tue) 11:26, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> On 18 March 2014 07:20, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 11:41:38AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >> > What about using a more generic name which is not bound to 80211 since
> >> > the
> >> > field is a generic pointer. This may allo
On 18 March 2014 07:20, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 11:41:38AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> > What about using a more generic name which is not bound to 80211 since the
>> > field is a generic pointer. This may allow us to use something similar in
>> > other drivers like mpe(4
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 11:41:38AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > What about using a more generic name which is not bound to 80211 since the
> > field is a generic pointer. This may allow us to use something similar in
> > other drivers like mpe(4), gif(4), gre(4).
>
> That is basically the only
> What about using a more generic name which is not bound to 80211 since the
> field is a generic pointer. This may allow us to use something similar in
> other drivers like mpe(4), gif(4), gre(4).
That is basically the only thought I had. I mean you could also start
passing it as a mbuf tag, but
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 11:14:24AM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 14/03/14(Fri) 15:46, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > Diff below adds a new pointer to "struct pkthdr" to explicitly pass
> > some wireless nodes to the pointer without abusing the interface
> > pointer that I'd like to kill.
> >
> >
On 14/03/14(Fri) 15:46, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Diff below adds a new pointer to "struct pkthdr" to explicitly pass
> some wireless nodes to the pointer without abusing the interface
> pointer that I'd like to kill.
>
> I kept and updated the comments saying that this way of passing the
> corresp
Diff below adds a new pointer to "struct pkthdr" to explicitly pass
some wireless nodes to the pointer without abusing the interface
pointer that I'd like to kill.
I kept and updated the comments saying that this way of passing the
corresponding node is a hack since using a dedicated pointer does
