On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 11:20:56AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 27/08/13(Tue) 10:44, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 03:38:49PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > So I started to play with the routine table and I'm slowly trying to
> > > unify the various code paths t
On 27/08/13(Tue) 10:44, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 03:38:49PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > So I started to play with the routine table and I'm slowly trying to
> > unify the various code paths to add and delete route entries. The
> > diff below is a first step, it
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 03:38:49PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> So I started to play with the routine table and I'm slowly trying to
> unify the various code paths to add and delete route entries. The
> diff below is a first step, it splits rtinit() into rt_add() and
> rt_delete() there should
So I started to play with the routine table and I'm slowly trying to
unify the various code paths to add and delete route entries. The
diff below is a first step, it splits rtinit() into rt_add() and
rt_delete() there should be no functional change.
ok?
Index: net/if.c
=
