Re: SOCKET_LOCK looking for testers

2016-11-04 Thread Simon Mages
Hi, i did some performance measurements with and without your diff on OpenBSD-current. There is no performance difference. I think this is the expected outcome. BR Simon 2016-11-04 10:12 GMT+01:00, Martin Pieuchot : > On 03/11/16(Thu) 11:21, Martin Pieuchot wrote: >> Here's the next iteration o

Re: SOCKET_LOCK looking for testers

2016-11-04 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 03/11/16(Thu) 11:21, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > Here's the next iteration of my diff introducing a rwlock to serialize > the network input path with socket paths. Changes are: > > - more timeout_set_proc() that should fix problems reported by > Chris Jackman. > > - I introduced a set of

Re: SOCKET_LOCK looking for testers

2016-11-03 Thread Nils Frohberg
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 11:21:52AM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > Here's the next iteration of my diff introducing a rwlock to serialize > the network input path with socket paths. Changes are: This crashes with very similar symptoms to the ones I reported to you when I tested the netlock patch.

SOCKET_LOCK looking for testers

2016-11-03 Thread Martin Pieuchot
Here's the next iteration of my diff introducing a rwlock to serialize the network input path with socket paths. Changes are: - more timeout_set_proc() that should fix problems reported by Chris Jackman. - I introduced a set of macro to make it easier to audit existing splsoftnet().