Thanks,
I commited it to move forward.
On 06/09/17 15:41, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 03:28:07PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
>> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 02:29:03PM +0200, Florian Riehm wrote:
>>> @@ -359,6 +333,7 @@ kr_fib_decouple(void)
>>> void
>>> kr_dispatch_msg(int fd,
On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 03:28:07PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 02:29:03PM +0200, Florian Riehm wrote:
> > @@ -359,6 +333,7 @@ kr_fib_decouple(void)
> > void
> > kr_dispatch_msg(int fd, short event, void *bula)
> > {
> > + /* XXX this is stupid */
> > dispatch_rt
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 02:29:03PM +0200, Florian Riehm wrote:
> @@ -359,6 +333,7 @@ kr_fib_decouple(void)
> void
> kr_dispatch_msg(int fd, short event, void *bula)
> {
> + /* XXX this is stupid */
> dispatch_rtmsg();
> }
I guess this comment refers to the event_loopexit(NULL) in osp
Hi,
this diff adds priority support to ospf6d.
Mostly based on the following ospfd commit:
cvs diff -D "2008-12-11" -D "2008-12-13"
Additionally I removed the RTF_UP from hdr.rtm_flags in send_rtmsg().
Ospfd and bgpd also don't set the flag.
The next steps will be to add support for ospf6ctl fib
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 08:43:02PM +0200, Florian Riehm wrote:
> > The attached patch ports the multipath support from ospfd to ospf6d.
> @@ -171,48 +260,30 @@ kr_change(struct kroute *kroute)
>* - zero out ifindex (this is no longer relevant)
>*/
>
On 05/12/17 18:07, Florian Riehm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> our QA reports issues with the ospf6d since the kernel uses more multipath
> routes.
> It exits after certain topology changes with:
> rde_send_change_kroute: no valid nexthop found
>
> Since the kernel uses more multipath routes, the lack of mult
Hi,
our QA reports issues with the ospf6d since the kernel uses more multipath
routes.
It exits after certain topology changes with:
rde_send_change_kroute: no valid nexthop found
Since the kernel uses more multipath routes, the lack of multipath support in
ospf6d became a problem.
The attached
