Re: Remove some customization from our perl build

2020-05-18 Thread Alexander Bluhm
On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 09:49:54AM -0700, Andrew Hewus Fresh wrote: > I think this patch is now cleaned up enough to look for OKs. OK bluhm@ > The patch to numeric.c works around an issue with clang and > -Wdeclaration-after-statement that was fixed more correctly upstream, > but pulling in the f

Re: Remove some customization from our perl build

2020-05-17 Thread Andrew Hewus Fresh
I think this patch is now cleaned up enough to look for OKs. The patch to numeric.c works around an issue with clang and -Wdeclaration-after-statement that was fixed more correctly upstream, but pulling in the full fix in seemed like overkill for now. https://github.com/Perl/perl5/issues/17725 ht

Re: Remove some customization from our perl build

2020-04-12 Thread Theo de Raadt
Andrew Hewus Fresh wrote: > On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 07:34:21PM -0600, Todd C. Miller wrote: > > On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 18:17:33 -0700, Andrew Hewus Fresh wrote: > > > > > Recently it was pointed out that we don't link /usr/lib/libperl.so.* to > > > libm the way is expected for code that also links

Re: Remove some customization from our perl build

2020-04-12 Thread Andrew Hewus Fresh
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 07:34:21PM -0600, Todd C. Miller wrote: > On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 18:17:33 -0700, Andrew Hewus Fresh wrote: > > > Recently it was pointed out that we don't link /usr/lib/libperl.so.* to > > libm the way is expected for code that also links to libperl. That led > > me to go dig

Re: Remove some customization from our perl build

2020-04-10 Thread Theo de Raadt
Todd C. Miller wrote: > On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 18:17:33 -0700, Andrew Hewus Fresh wrote: > > > Recently it was pointed out that we don't link /usr/lib/libperl.so.* to > > libm the way is expected for code that also links to libperl. That led > > me to go digging again into the customization we hav

Re: Remove some customization from our perl build

2020-04-10 Thread Todd C . Miller
On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 18:17:33 -0700, Andrew Hewus Fresh wrote: > Recently it was pointed out that we don't link /usr/lib/libperl.so.* to > libm the way is expected for code that also links to libperl. That led > me to go digging again into the customization we have around the perl > build and gett

Remove some customization from our perl build

2020-04-10 Thread Andrew Hewus Fresh
Recently it was pointed out that we don't link /usr/lib/libperl.so.* to libm the way is expected for code that also links to libperl. That led me to go digging again into the customization we have around the perl build and getting terribly confused. That did somewhat clear up after reading more a