ping
On 06/02/18 16:08, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> anyone?
>
> On 05/24/18 09:40, Martijn van Duren wrote:
>> Since we accept "!" as a full command to system(3), I decided to do even
>> more trimming than when BACKWARDS is not defined. This way we trim even
>> more LoC and have one less error cas
anyone?
On 05/24/18 09:40, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> Since we accept "!" as a full command to system(3), I decided to do even
> more trimming than when BACKWARDS is not defined. This way we trim even
> more LoC and have one less error case.
>
> Note that running "!!" without a prior command adds
Since we accept "!" as a full command to system(3), I decided to do even
more trimming than when BACKWARDS is not defined. This way we trim even
more LoC and have one less error case.
Note that running "!!" without a prior command adds an extra empty line
if suppress diagnostics is not active, bec
