On Sun, 2017-12-10 at 12:48 -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> In our tree, all security or front-facing code must be maintained by
> an interested individual/group. If it isn't maintained eventually it
> will become a hinderance towards other developments, or error prone
> and therefore a risk factor.
On Sun, 2017-12-10 at 19:14 +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 10/12/17(Sun) 17:59, Joachim Nilsson wrote:
> > [...]
> > Now, I've got a few worried questions recently about the removal[3]
> > of PIM support in OpenBSD, so I thought I'd ask here. Why have you
> > removed it?
> [...]
> Last year r
Thanks for the info!
Forgot about few such examples, such as sources don't signal so there is a
timeout counter for (s,g) that need to be monitored, traffic utilization
that might trigger SFP and I guess many more
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 11:33 PM, Claudio Jeker
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 201
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 02:32:06PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
>
> > On 12 Dec 2017, at 02:41, Dan Shechter wrote:
> >
> > I know I am about to be hammered here but...
> >
> > Without reading the sources, and being a Cisco admin, I am asking this
> > question: What PIM got to do with the kernel?
> On 12 Dec 2017, at 02:41, Dan Shechter wrote:
>
> I know I am about to be hammered here but...
>
> Without reading the sources, and being a Cisco admin, I am asking this
> question: What PIM got to do with the kernel? PIM is just a
> signaling/routing protocol, like OSPF/BGP. It should just u
I know I am about to be hammered here but...
Without reading the sources, and being a Cisco admin, I am asking this
question: What PIM got to do with the kernel? PIM is just a
signaling/routing protocol, like OSPF/BGP. It should just update the mroute
tables.
Is it about the register unicast?
On
> I'd welcome anyone interested in PIM to work on it. I'd be great to
> have proper kernel support that meets OpenBSD standard and have it
> enabled by default. If you're interested in such work, I can help you
> getting started ;)
Joachim,
In our tree, all security or front-facing code must be
On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 07:14:43PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 10/12/17(Sun) 17:59, Joachim Nilsson wrote:
> > [...]
> > Now, I've got a few worried questions recently about the removal[3]
> > of PIM support in OpenBSD, so I thought I'd ask here. Why have you
> > removed it? I'd be very h
On 10/12/17(Sun) 17:59, Joachim Nilsson wrote:
> [...]
> Now, I've got a few worried questions recently about the removal[3]
> of PIM support in OpenBSD, so I thought I'd ask here. Why have you
> removed it? I'd be very happy if someone could just fill me in, or
> provide a pointer to a mailing
On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 05:59:33PM +0100, Joachim Nilsson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> my name i Joachim and I'm the current upstream maintainer of the
> original pimd[1] and mrouted[2] multicast routing daemons.
>
> First of all, I'd like to give a huge thank you to the OpenBSD team
> for all the hard work
Hi,
my name i Joachim and I'm the current upstream maintainer of the
original pimd[1] and mrouted[2] multicast routing daemons.
First of all, I'd like to give a huge thank you to the OpenBSD team
for all the hard work you put in with Stanford to relicense mrouted
under a BSD license[4]! I don't
11 matches
Mail list logo
