On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:43:21PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
I think a better step forward for LC_TIME support would be to focus on
nl_langinfo() first and make it return locale-specific data for LC_TIME.
The functions you're looking at are icing on the cake. We should be
looking at adding mo
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 02:57:17PM -0700, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > Your regression test has at least one bug ('bad' is never initialised).
>
> It's perhaps bad *style* to not explicitly initialize it, but C99
> 6.7.8p10 says "If an objec
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> Your regression test has at least one bug ('bad' is never initialised).
It's perhaps bad *style* to not explicitly initialize it, but C99
6.7.8p10 says "If an object that has static storage duration is not
initialized explicitly, then: [..
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:52:09AM -0500, Vladimir Támara Patiño wrote:
> I see a lot of duplication between lib/libc/time/strftime.c and
> lib/libc/time/wcsftime.c.
>
> Since I would like to implement LC_TIME support, I would prefer to
> change only in one place but before that I prepared a simpl
I see a lot of duplication between lib/libc/time/strftime.c and
lib/libc/time/wcsftime.c.
Since I would like to implement LC_TIME support, I would prefer to
change only in one place but before that I prepared a simple
regression test for strftime and wcsftime that is attached.
Checking NetBSD
