This diff is incorrect, I should've tested it before sending it. Thank
you to everyone that replied and sorry if it was a bother/inconvenience.
On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 08:07 +0200, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, Jun 18, 2023 at 06:29:28PM -0600, Ashlen wrote:
> > On Sun, 18 Jun 2023
Hello,
On Sun, Jun 18, 2023 at 06:29:28PM -0600, Ashlen wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Jun 2023 20:35 +0200, Stephan Neuhaus wrote:
> > Hi list
> >
> > I think I have found a typo in the pf NAT FAQ here:
> > https://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/nat.html. In the
> > "Configuring NAT" section it says:
> >
> > Th
On Sun, 18 Jun 2023 20:35 +0200, Stephan Neuhaus wrote:
> Hi list
>
> I think I have found a typo in the pf NAT FAQ here:
> https://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/nat.html. In the
> "Configuring NAT" section it says:
>
> The general format in pf.conf looks something like this:
>
> match out on inter
Ah ok I may have a not too updated mirror then I updated locally like 1h
ago. Thanks !
On 15 June 2016 at 17:28, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 17:26:46 +0100, David CARLIER wrote:
>
> > maybe someone already mentioned it, but I tried to compile the kernel
> today
> > and
> > in sys
On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 17:26:46 +0100, David CARLIER wrote:
> maybe someone already mentioned it, but I tried to compile the kernel today
> and
> in sys/netinet/udp_usrreq.c, line 937 might contain an extra parenthesis
> after the first condition
>
> ie
>
> if ((inp->inp_flags & INP_IPSECFLOWINFO)
Hi all,
maybe someone already mentioned it, but I tried to compile the kernel today
and
in sys/netinet/udp_usrreq.c, line 937 might contain an extra parenthesis
after the first condition
ie
if ((inp->inp_flags & INP_IPSECFLOWINFO) != 0
*)*
Hope it s useful.
Regards.
