On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 6:27 AM, Gregor Best wrote:
>
> according to sysctl(3), AF_ROUTE is incorrect as a second level name for
> the CTL_NET sysctl. The attached patch corrects this. Since PF_ROUTE is
> defined to AF_ROUTE, there are no functional changes, but the style
> stays consistent this w
Hi people,
according to sysctl(3), AF_ROUTE is incorrect as a second level name for
the CTL_NET sysctl. The attached patch corrects this. Since PF_ROUTE is
defined to AF_ROUTE, there are no functional changes, but the style
stays consistent this way.
I have also noticed that sysctl(3) does not do
