On 18 jan 2011, at 00.44, Brad wrote:
> What shipped with 4.8 was incomplete. That is not in a usable state and
still
> isn't now that binaries are being built and installed. Well you have a
> different definition of what "works" means. Do we ship BIND without
> the /etc/rc start up bits and /var/
On Monday 17 January 2011 17:13:25 Jakob Schlyter wrote:
> On 16 jan 2011, at 23.03, Brad wrote:
> > The release is quickly approaching. The proposed diff still has issues.
> > If this stuff is not resolved and commited before the release nsd in base
> > should be disabled. Shipping incomplete and
On 17 jan 2011, at 23.13, Jakob Schlyter wrote:
> NSD in the tree works just fine (although running as root) - it is no worse
than it was in 4.8.
correction: nsd is of course not running as root, it's running as user _nsd.
jakob
On 16 jan 2011, at 23.03, Brad wrote:
> The release is quickly approaching. The proposed diff still has issues. If
> this stuff is not resolved and commited before the release nsd in base
> should be disabled. Shipping incomplete and broken stuff isn't very useful
> for users.
yes, the proposed d
On 16 jan 2011, at 23.03, Brad wrote:
> The release is quickly approaching. The proposed diff still has issues. If
> this stuff is not resolved and commited before the release nsd in base
> should be disabled. Shipping incomplete and broken stuff isn't very useful
> for users.
I agree. Do we hav
On Friday 01 October 2010 16:50:33 Jakob Schlyter wrote:
> The following patches makes establish the following default NSD
> permissions/locations:
>
> - /var/nsd/db for stuff that nsd(8) may write to (as user/group _nsd)
> - /var/nsd/nsd.db for the read-only database.
> - /var/nsd/zones default zo
On 2010/10/02 15:06, Jakob Schlyter wrote:
> On 2 okt 2010, at 13.48, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> > I think it makes sense to do have a separate user for these, that's how
> > I've been running nsd in the past.
>
> did you make nsd-{patch,zonec} drop privs to that user, or did you start them
> as
On 2 okt 2010, at 13.48, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> I think it makes sense to do have a separate user for these, that's how
> I've been running nsd in the past.
did you make nsd-{patch,zonec} drop privs to that user, or did you start them
as the user?
where did you put nsd.db? I guess a subdir of
On 2010/10/01 22:50, Jakob Schlyter wrote:
> The following patches makes establish the following default NSD
> permissions/locations:
>
> - /var/nsd/db for stuff that nsd(8) may write to (as user/group _nsd)
> - /var/nsd/nsd.db for the read-only database.
> - /var/nsd/zones default zone directory.
The following patches makes establish the following default NSD
permissions/locations:
- /var/nsd/db for stuff that nsd(8) may write to (as user/group _nsd)
- /var/nsd/nsd.db for the read-only database.
- /var/nsd/zones default zone directory.
- /etc/nsd.conf for the config file
This still requir
10 matches
Mail list logo