> From: "Theo de Raadt"
> Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 15:34:18 -0600
>
> > On arm64, pci_intr_handle_t is a pointer to an opaque struct.
>
> That's a subtle trap. How would someone realize the order is wrong...
>
> Would it not be better if this was done like the other architectures,
> where the pc
> On arm64, pci_intr_handle_t is a pointer to an opaque struct.
That's a subtle trap. How would someone realize the order is wrong...
Would it not be better if this was done like the other architectures,
where the pci_intr_handle_t is a structure, not a pointer.
On arm64, the pci subsystems see
To set up an interrupt handler for a PCI device, you need to do
something like this:
pci_intr_handle_t ih;
pci_intr_map(pa, &ih);
printf(": %s", pci_intr_string(pa->pa_pc, ih));
pci_intr_establish(pa->pa_pc, ih, ...);
On arm64, pci_intr_handle_t is a pointer to an opaque
