On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 06:13:29AM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 04:42:09PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> > this works great for me. i'll pressure claudio@ to have a look at it over
> > the
> > next week or two.
> >
>
> I just commited this (a modified version of the diff
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 04:42:09PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> this works great for me. i'll pressure claudio@ to have a look at it over the
> next week or two.
>
I just commited this (a modified version of the diff by Patrick Coleman)
and will now look at the interface add problem (and Martin P
this works great for me. i'll pressure claudio@ to have a look at it over the
next week or two.
cheers,
dlg
On 25/04/2011, at 8:44 PM, Patrick Coleman wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Jan Johansson
wrote:
>>
>> So I found a bug here.
>>
>> Your mk2 patch (didn't try the mk1) does not ad
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Jan Johansson wrote:
>
> So I found a bug here.
>
> Your mk2 patch (didn't try the mk1) does not advertise gif
> tunnels this works with the unpatched binary.
Apologies for the delay on this one - finally got around to setting up
a test environment today. See [1] f
Hello!
Just a FYI.
I have now upgraded our five IPv6 routers with the first patch
Patrick sent out. We are seeing some problems with the fib and
kernel routing getting out of sync when rebooting the core
routers. This is fixed by doing "down" and "up" on the gif tunnel
interface. We see this as g
Patrick Coleman wrote:
> Ok, the following should fix this. It's a little more involved; here's
> what's new:
>
> http://patrick.ld.net.au/ospf6d-fix-passive-interfaces-mk2.patch
So I found a bug here.
Your mk2 patch (didn't try the mk1) does not advertise gif
tunnels this works with the unpatc
Patrick Coleman wrote:
> Ok, the following should fix this. It's a little more involved; here's
> what's new:
> - Avoid sending LSAs if the link state is down (to avoid
> double-advertising CARP interfaces). OSPFd does this a little more
> elegantly using metrics[1], but I wasn't able to get that
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Jan Johansson wrote:
> If an CARP interface is in BACKUP state the route is still
> advertised which leads to assymetric routing.
Ok, the following should fix this. It's a little more involved; here's
what's new:
- Avoid sending LSAs if the link state is down (to a
Patrick Coleman wrote:
> I've found that if an interface is declared passive (or is a
> CARP interface) in ospf6d.conf, ospf6d will not send LSAs for
> that interface, and any associated prefixes will not be
> advertised. This is contrary to the behaviour in ospfd and what
> I would expect.
Hello
Hi,
I've found that if an interface is declared passive (or is a CARP
interface) in ospf6d.conf, ospf6d will not send LSAs for that
interface, and any associated prefixes will not be advertised. This is
contrary to the behaviour in ospfd and what I would expect.
The problem appears to be that ori
10 matches
Mail list logo
