On 08/07/19(Mon) 15:00, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 26/06/19(Wed) 19:13, Christian Ludwig wrote:
> > We have two variables with the same meaning. db_active is used in way
> > more places, so let's nuke db_is_active.
>
> Thanks for the cleanup!
>
> > Now that db_active is in for a while already a
On 26/06/19(Wed) 19:13, Christian Ludwig wrote:
> We have two variables with the same meaning. db_active is used in way
> more places, so let's nuke db_is_active.
Thanks for the cleanup!
> Now that db_active is in for a while already and not
> guarded by DDB anymore, take the opportunity to clea
We have two variables with the same meaning. db_active is used in way
more places, so let's nuke db_is_active.
Now that db_active is in for a while already and not
guarded by DDB anymore, take the opportunity to clean up some places
that use it.
---
sys/arch/macppc/dev/zs.c | 8 ++
