> However, I'm just going to upgrade to OpenBSD 4.7 and because of the new
> pf syntax I have to "convert" my configurations. It's not a big deal
> except for one thing.
> I didn't find the replacement for the "no nat" statement.
> How is that supposed to be specified now?
pass quick.
you don't n
Hi everybody,
I'm not that sure this is the right mailing list which I can post this
message. The misc sounds too generic and hopefully the tech is not
supposed to receive such a trivial question.
However, I'm just going to upgrade to OpenBSD 4.7 and because of the new
pf syntax I have to "convert
