Re: NET_LOCK() w/o argument

2017-08-11 Thread Hrvoje Popovski
On 11.8.2017. 19:56, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > Two weeks ago I remove the splsoftnet()/splx() dance inside the > NET_LOCK(). Turns out we found a single bug, a missing splx() > in net/if_spppsubr.c. > > I believe it's time to move forward and completely remove the > argument. This will allow us t

Re: NET_LOCK() w/o argument

2017-08-11 Thread Alexander Bluhm
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 01:56:28PM -0400, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > I believe it's time to move forward and completely remove the > argument. This will allow us to do more funky dances with the > NET_LOCK(). OK bluhm@ > diff --git sys/dev/usb/if_umb.c sys/dev/usb/if_umb.c > index 1fbf2ea9c15..8c6

NET_LOCK() w/o argument

2017-08-11 Thread Martin Pieuchot
Two weeks ago I remove the splsoftnet()/splx() dance inside the NET_LOCK(). Turns out we found a single bug, a missing splx() in net/if_spppsubr.c. I believe it's time to move forward and completely remove the argument. This will allow us to do more funky dances with the NET_LOCK(). ok? diff -