On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 10:31 PM, Brad Smith wrote:
> ping. Discussion died out. Can we please move this issue forward?
It's in
Philip
On 09/20/14 15:34, Philip Guenther wrote:
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 18:15:31 +
From: Miod Vallat
shmctl(2)/shmget(2)/shmat(2) all document
#include
#include
#include
as a requirement for calling these functions.
That was my first
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 16:20, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 12:34:42 -0700
>> From: Philip Guenther
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Mark Kettenis
> wrote:
>> >> Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 18:15:31 +
>> >> From: Miod Vallat
>> >>
>> >> > shmctl(2)/shmget(2)/shmat(2) all
> Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 12:34:42 -0700
> From: Philip Guenther
>
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Mark Kettenis
> wrote:
> >> Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 18:15:31 +
> >> From: Miod Vallat
> >>
> >> > shmctl(2)/shmget(2)/shmat(2) all document
> >> >
> >> > #include
> >> > #include
> >> > #
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 18:15:31 +
>> From: Miod Vallat
>>
>> > shmctl(2)/shmget(2)/shmat(2) all document
>> >
>> > #include
>> > #include
>> > #include
>> >
>> > as a requirement for calling these functions.
>>
>> That was my first
> Unfortunately it doesn't allow us to make everything in
> available though. So simply including from
> isn't the right solution.
Good point,
I didn't notice that, I was just testing sys/shm.h based on what
POSIX 2008 specification says and detected that this isn't working
as it should.
Oh, looks like man pages should be fixed too. There is no mention in
POSIX 2008 that sys/types.h and sys/ipc.h should be included:
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/shmctl.html
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/shmget.html
http://pubs.opengroup.org/o
> Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 18:15:31 +
> From: Miod Vallat
>
> > shmctl(2)/shmget(2)/shmat(2) all document
> >
> > #include
> > #include
> > #include
> >
> > as a requirement for calling these functions.
>
> That was my first thought, but according to
> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs
> shmctl(2)/shmget(2)/shmat(2) all document
>
> #include
> #include
> #include
>
> as a requirement for calling these functions.
That was my first thought, but according to
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/sys_ipc.h.html
``The header shall define the uid_t, gid_t, mod
shmctl(2)/shmget(2)/shmat(2) all document
#include
#include
#include
as a requirement for calling these functions.
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 01:24:02PM +0300, Matti Karnaattu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I managed to get build error which was caused a missing include.
>
> test:
> =
Hello,
I managed to get build error which was caused a missing include.
test:
===
#include
int
main(void)
{
return 0;
}
===
And here is diff that fixes the bu
11 matches
Mail list logo