On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 05:24:30PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 11:32:07 +1100
> > From: Jonathan Gray
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 09:53:41PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > It's currently a bit of a pain to install clang and ld.lld, but keep
> > > gcc and ld.bfd a
> Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 11:32:07 +1100
> From: Jonathan Gray
>
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 09:53:41PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > It's currently a bit of a pain to install clang and ld.lld, but keep
> > gcc and ld.bfd as the default compiler/linker. You can't rebuild
> > clang with base gcc a
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 09:53:41PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> It's currently a bit of a pain to install clang and ld.lld, but keep
> gcc and ld.bfd as the default compiler/linker. You can't rebuild
> clang with base gcc and you really want to rebuild it with clang
> instead of the ports gcc aft
It's currently a bit of a pain to install clang and ld.lld, but keep
gcc and ld.bfd as the default compiler/linker. You can't rebuild
clang with base gcc and you really want to rebuild it with clang
instead of the ports gcc after boostrapping. And overwriting the
default compiler/linker links is
