Re: Make every interface with a watchdog register it's own timeout

2014-11-28 Thread Mike Belopuhov
I've got one ok for this. Can I have another one please? On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 13:54 +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote: > On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 12:06 +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > On 23/11/14(Sun) 02:10, Mike Belopuhov wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > This removes the system wide if_slowtimo timeo

Re: Make every interface with a watchdog register it's own timeout

2014-11-24 Thread Mike Belopuhov
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 12:06 +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > On 23/11/14(Sun) 02:10, Mike Belopuhov wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This removes the system wide if_slowtimo timeout and lets every > > interface with a valid if_watchdog method register it's own. > > The rational is to get rid of the ifnet l

Re: Make every interface with a watchdog register it's own timeout

2014-11-24 Thread Mike Belopuhov
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 13:39 +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote: > On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 02:10:24AM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This removes the system wide if_slowtimo timeout and lets every > > interface with a valid if_watchdog method register it's own. > > The rational is to get ri

Re: Make every interface with a watchdog register it's own timeout

2014-11-23 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 02:10:24AM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote: > Hi, > > This removes the system wide if_slowtimo timeout and lets every > interface with a valid if_watchdog method register it's own. > The rational is to get rid of the ifnet loop in the softclock > context to avoid further compli

Re: Make every interface with a watchdog register it's own timeout

2014-11-23 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 23/11/14(Sun) 02:10, Mike Belopuhov wrote: > Hi, > > This removes the system wide if_slowtimo timeout and lets every > interface with a valid if_watchdog method register it's own. > The rational is to get rid of the ifnet loop in the softclock > context to avoid further complications with concu

Re: Make every interface with a watchdog register it's own timeout

2014-11-22 Thread Theo de Raadt
> Now that I think of it, perhaps I should have called it if_slowtimo like > the function. Any preference? Yes perhaps, because watchdog has connotation in our kernel tree.

Re: Make every interface with a watchdog register it's own timeout

2014-11-22 Thread Mike Belopuhov
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 02:10 +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote: > Hi, > > This removes the system wide if_slowtimo timeout and lets every > interface with a valid if_watchdog method register it's own. > The rational is to get rid of the ifnet loop in the softclock > context to avoid further complicatio

Make every interface with a watchdog register it's own timeout

2014-11-22 Thread Mike Belopuhov
Hi, This removes the system wide if_slowtimo timeout and lets every interface with a valid if_watchdog method register it's own. The rational is to get rid of the ifnet loop in the softclock context to avoid further complications with concurrent access to the ifnet list. This might also save some