---
src/crypto/srp/srp_lib.c |8 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/crypto/srp/srp_lib.c b/src/crypto/srp/srp_lib.c
index 15e751c..0875b29 100644
--- a/src/crypto/srp/srp_lib.c
+++ b/src/crypto/srp/srp_lib.c
@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ BIGNUM *SRP_Calc_A(BIGNUM
Hi,
> That said, I think the DigestUpdate and similar checks are unnecessary
> and complicate the code more than they help. Those functions really
> can't fail.
Hmm, which ones specifically? In particular for DigestUpdate I always
wondered why that should fail, but adding a few error checks usual
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 18:17, Florian Zumbiehl wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> may I draw your attention to this (my) ticket in the OpenSSL bug tracker?
>
> http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=3226&user=guest&pass=guest
>
> The patch adds various error checks and fixes an undefined return value i
Hi all,
may I draw your attention to this (my) ticket in the OpenSSL bug tracker?
http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=3226&user=guest&pass=guest
The patch adds various error checks and fixes an undefined return value in
case of error that could happen despite the error checking that's i