On OpenBSD, FreeBSD, Debian, and Ubuntu setting a library as
executable means you can run it directly, and since ./libressl.so
won't work it shouldn't be 755.
Ten minutes of research reveals that Red Hat sets the execute bit on
all shared libraries, and while its ldd script complains if it's not
se
2014-07-14 21:30 GMT+02:00 Jan Engelhardt :
> On Monday 2014-07-14 20:34, Bob Beck wrote:
>
>>What problem are you trying to solve here.
>
>>> Pristine libtool does not pass -m 644, and default (GNU) install
>>> defaults to mode 755 when not specifying anything else.
>
> I am trying to figure out w
On Monday 2014-07-14 20:34, Bob Beck wrote:
>What problem are you trying to solve here.
>> Pristine libtool does not pass -m 644, and default (GNU) install
>> defaults to mode 755 when not specifying anything else.
I am trying to figure out why OpenBSD would be patching libtool
and adding
+
What problem are you trying to solve here.
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> On Monday 2014-07-14 20:16, Toni Mueller wrote:
>>Hi Jan,
>>
>>On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 08:30:38PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>>> On Sunday 2014-07-13 13:07, Bob Beck wrote:
>>> >We have releas
On Monday 2014-07-14 20:16, Toni Mueller wrote:
>Hi Jan,
>
>On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 08:30:38PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> On Sunday 2014-07-13 13:07, Bob Beck wrote:
>> >We have released an update, LibreSSL 2.0.1
>> >As noted before, we welcome feedback from the broader community.
>>
>> Some
Hi Jan,
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 08:30:38PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Sunday 2014-07-13 13:07, Bob Beck wrote:
> >We have released an update, LibreSSL 2.0.1
> >As noted before, we welcome feedback from the broader community.
>
> Something that I have noticed is that the shared libraries
On Jul 13, 2014, at 5:45 PM, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Sunday 2014-07-13 17:36, Brent Cook wrote:
This release includes a number of portability fixes based on the
initial feedback we have received from the community.
>>>
>>> I was looking at Solaris documentation and found tha
On Sunday 2014-07-13 13:07, Bob Beck wrote:
>We have released an update, LibreSSL 2.0.1
>As noted before, we welcome feedback from the broader community.
Something that I have noticed is that the shared libraries generated
by the portable libressl tarball are installed to their final
location (i
On Sunday 2014-07-13 17:36, Brent Cook wrote:
>>>
>>> This release includes a number of portability fixes based on the
>>> initial feedback we have received from the community.
>>
>> I was looking at Solaris documentation and found that -lrt may be
>> needed for some versions as well. A test ha
On Jul 13, 2014, at 4:36 PM, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Sunday 2014-07-13 13:07, Bob Beck wrote:
>>
>> This release includes a number of portability fixes based on the
>> initial feedback
>> we have received from the community.
>
>
> I was looking at Solaris documentation and found that -lrt m
On Sunday 2014-07-13 13:07, Bob Beck wrote:
>
>This release includes a number of portability fixes based on the
>initial feedback
>we have received from the community.
I was looking at Solaris documentation and found that -lrt may be needed
for some versions as well. A test has not been conducte
Also starting with this release the directory includes SHA256
signatures which are signed using signify.
The signify public key for libressl is:
untrusted comment: LibreSSL Portable public key
RWQg/nutTVqCUVUw8OhyHt9n51IC8mdQRd1b93dOyVrwtIXmMI+dtGFe
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 5:07 AM, Bob Beck wr
We have released an update, LibreSSL 2.0.1
This release includes a number of portability fixes based on the
initial feedback
we have received from the community. This includes among other things
two new configure options to set OPENSSLDIR and ENGINESDIR. We have
removed a few hardcoded compiler o
13 matches
Mail list logo
