On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 15:17 +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> ``ipforward_rt'' is going away but rather than sending a big diff,
> here's the first step.
>
> This diff replaces in_rtaddr() by rtalloc(9). Note that since the code
> here is interested in rt_ifa it has to call rtisvalid(9) to preven
``ipforward_rt'' is going away but rather than sending a big diff,
here's the first step.
This diff replaces in_rtaddr() by rtalloc(9). Note that since the code
here is interested in rt_ifa it has to call rtisvalid(9) to prevent a
NULL-dereference in case of a stale ``ifa''.
For the same reason
