On 08/11/17(Wed) 12:22, Saša Nedvědický wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think the recent diff should go in so I can pick it up to my tree.
> It's the same what I have in my net/systm.h
>
> What I also found that in some cases, we are going to
> grab KERNEL_LOCK(), while running in in_input_process().
> thi
Hello,
I think the recent diff should go in so I can pick it up to my tree.
It's the same what I have in my net/systm.h
What I also found that in some cases, we are going to
grab KERNEL_LOCK(), while running in in_input_process().
this typically happens when we deal with multicast forwarding
in i
> Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 10:37:02 +0100
> From: Martin Pieuchot
>
> We're at the stage where we want to run multiple parts of the Network
> Stack in parallel. sashan@ is trying to get multiple network threads
> running to exercise parallelism in pf_test() and tb@ is trying to push
> the NET_LOCK(
On 08/11/17(Wed) 10:37, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> We're at the stage where we want to run multiple parts of the Network
> Stack in parallel. sashan@ is trying to get multiple network threads
> running to exercise parallelism in pf_test() and tb@ is trying to push
> the NET_LOCK() further down in io
We're at the stage where we want to run multiple parts of the Network
Stack in parallel. sashan@ is trying to get multiple network threads
running to exercise parallelism in pf_test() and tb@ is trying to push
the NET_LOCK() further down in ioctl(2) path.
However we want to be able to gradually s