On 13-11-05 10:12 AM, Adam Thompson wrote:
I can do doc changes, but I think you really, *really* don't want me
writing much C code... I can perhaps do some of the initial, trivial,
legwork, at best. Now, if bgpd(8) were written in Bourne/Korn shell,
I'd be the guy to do this!
I recall now t
On 13-11-04 05:09 PM, Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 10:36:39AM -0600, Adam Thompson wrote:
The change I think we're both asking for is that in
.../usr/sbin/bgpd/kroute.c, on line 505 (5.4-RELEASE), where we see
"kr->r.priority = RTP_BGP;", we need a way to override that value
in
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 10:36:39AM -0600, Adam Thompson wrote:
> On 13-11-03 02:27 PM, Loïc BLOT wrote:
> >then to explain my draft here is my own configuration, and why it could
> >be useful to set custom priorities:
> >[...]
> >Without the possibility to change the priorities (and dynamically is
On 13-11-03 02:27 PM, Loïc BLOT wrote:
then to explain my draft here is my own configuration, and why it could
be useful to set custom priorities:
[...]
Without the possibility to change the priorities (and dynamically is
better than recompile the kernel and change constant values, it would be
a
Hi,
then to explain my draft here is my own configuration, and why it could
be useful to set custom priorities:
OSPF Scheme:
| - RT1 - | | - RT3
WAN | | OSPF AREA |
| - RT2 - | | - RT4
RIP Scheme:
| - RT1 - |
WAN | | RIP AREA | - CISCO 45XX
Hello, that's powerful but my improvement isn't for this use. It's only an
improvement to route packets correctly, not dispatch charge.
I'll give you a concrete example this evening.
Loïc Blot,
Ingénieur systèmes UNIX, Sécurité et Réseaux
http://www.unix-experience.fr
Stuart Henderson a écri
On 2013/11/01 19:57, sven falempin wrote:
> FreeBSD propose to have a specific routing table for a process, which is
> even more powerful.
> When the router has multiple gateway i guess when a source address is
> choose the route should be chosen given that. Nothing more.
>
> What use of this <> d
Can you explain me what's the problem with m'y configuration ? I don't see what
is the problem.
Loïc Blot,
Ingénieur systèmes UNIX, Sécurité et Réseaux
http://www.unix-experience.fr
Chris Cappuccio a écrit :
>Lo?c BLOT [loic.b...@unix-experience.fr] wrote:
>> Hello sven,
>> it's not a routing
Lo?c BLOT [loic.b...@unix-experience.fr] wrote:
> Hello sven,
> it's not a routing table problem, it's only a modification on route
> priorities, it's not the same thing.
The two of you are solving totally different problems.
> Here is my example at work:
>
> I have BGP on the WAN, OSPF for my L
Hello sven,
it's not a routing table problem, it's only a modification on route
priorities, it's not the same thing.
Here is my example at work:
I have BGP on the WAN, OSPF for my LAN (+ over GRE tunnels) and RIP to
my CISCO catalyst 45XX.
The problem is simple. I have two routers in this configu
FreeBSD propose to have a specific routing table for a process, which is
even more powerful.
When the router has multiple gateway i guess when a source address is
choose the route should be chosen given that. Nothing more.
What use of this <> do you imagine ?, of course you may want
this traffic o
Hello @tech
Congratulations for the 5.4 release.
I want to explain a draft to improve a little routing administration on
OpenBSD, maybe for 5.5.
There is a lack on routing daemon, the possibility to change routing
priorities for some protocols.
At this time routing priority is a dedicated constan
12 matches
Mail list logo
