David Gwynne wrote:
> > On 22 Jan 2020, at 8:54 am, Damien Miller wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 22 Jan 2020, David Gwynne wrote:
> >
> >>> Index: sys/kern/kern_pledge.c
> >>> ===
> >>> RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/kern/kern_pledge.c,v
> >>> re
> On 22 Jan 2020, at 8:54 am, Damien Miller wrote:
>
> On Wed, 22 Jan 2020, David Gwynne wrote:
>
>>> Index: sys/kern/kern_pledge.c
>>> ===
>>> RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/kern/kern_pledge.c,v
>>> retrieving revision 1.255
>>> diff -u
I am a big grumpy about /etc/protocols becoming another file that
is bypassed (accepted transparently) in kernel pledge. but dlg
has convinced me hardcoding would be worse.
Hi,
I think that is a good idea.
On Wed, 22 Jan 2020 08:35:05 +1000
David Gwynne wrote:
> Has anyone got an opinion on this? I am still interested in doing more
> packet capture things on OpenBSD using GRE as a transport, and the idea
> of maintaining this out of tree just makes me feel tired.
>
On Wed, 22 Jan 2020, David Gwynne wrote:
> Has anyone got an opinion on this? I am still interested in doing more
> packet capture things on OpenBSD using GRE as a transport, and the idea
> of maintaining this out of tree just makes me feel tired.
This is cool. I don't spot any major problems wit
Has anyone got an opinion on this? I am still interested in doing more
packet capture things on OpenBSD using GRE as a transport, and the idea
of maintaining this out of tree just makes me feel tired.
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 06:34:50PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> i've been toying with this idea o
i've been toying with this idea of implementing GRE as a datagram
protocol that userland can use just like UDP. the idea is to make it
easy to support the implementation of NHRP in userland for mgre(4),
and also for ERSPAN* support without going down the path linux took**.
so this is the result of
